Showing posts with label strategic bombing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label strategic bombing. Show all posts

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Strategic Bombing and Strategic Blockades really means killing small kids until their soldier dads surrender without a rifle shot being fired


It wasn't till January 1945, a few months before the war ended, that British Tommies were finally on German soil, going mano a mano with Jerry.

The British war cabinet never expected it to happen at all - from September 1939 to June 1944 and beyond they thought German fathers in uniform would eventually surrender, shots unfired, rather than see all their kiddies at home starve to death from a British sea blockade or burn to death in an Allied firebombing campaign.

America's war command also never expected to have to invade Japan's mainland - again a sea blockade and a firebombing effort would make the Japanese men in uniform surrender rather than see all their kids starve or be burned alive.

The Italians had pioneered this stuff in the Thirties, first in Ethiopia and then in Spain - bombing children in cities to get their soldier fathers to surrender out in the front lines.

The Germans had good success with burning kids to death to hasten the surrender of their soldier fathers in Warsaw, Belgrade and in Rotterdam, and with less success in London and Leningrad, despite me-too, me-too help from the Italian air forces.

The German efforts to starve British kids to death by a U-boat blockade of food shipments, until their soldier dads surrendered without a shot, almost succeeded. As did their land and air blockade of Leningrad.

Extensive combat to the death between enormous armies, to decide the fate of nations, was always a second choice Plan B in WWII



The Russians might have liked to have defeated the Germans by burning German kids to death, just as the Germans were trying to do to Russian kids with their medium bombers, but lacked the capability to produce enough reliable, big, long ranger bombers.

That mattered because they were the nation furthest from their opponent's civilian centres during most of the war.

So they were forced to put ultra huge ground forces into direct combat with equally massive German land forces for three solid years before they began to put Germans on the run.

China and Japan also lacked enough reliable big long range bombers to break the stalemate in their land war, though Japan certainly tried very hard with what medium bombers they had.

It is almost unknown, outside of their own countries, that the Chinese and Russians still suffered 350,000 to 500,000 civilian deaths from efforts by old technology medium bombers.

Those deaths match those of Germany and Japan from the prolonged, massive and very high tech heavy bomber efforts against their nations.

Is it just the cynic in me that thinks that if all the major combatant nations had gassed kids in extermination camps, almost nobody would be talking about it today ?

So we talk up the Germans' Holocaust and ignore the awkward fact that all sides attempted to starve and burn enough enemy kids to death that they might win the war without firing a shot....

Thursday, October 4, 2012

"Sending in the Shovels" : June 6th 1944

How Omaha got its "P"
It was never supposed to have to come to this: the smart money - and Big Science - had long promised that (a) high tech strategic bombing would force the Germans out of the war without any need of an invasion and that (b) the Allies would have lots of cheap, pure, high tech synthetic penicillin.


But as usual Bullshit talks and Reality walks as the two "S"s both failed spectacularly to deliver.

 So it was then that early in the morning of June 6th 1944, a hundred thousand shivering infantry with low-tech rifles and a hundred thousand doses of  low tech natural penicillin were bobbing about off the beaches of Normandy, about to do the job right.

Once again at the last minute , to snatch low tech victory from the jaws of high tech defeat, the wise and the mighty were reduced to "sending in the shovels".

Shades of the supposed "high tech" led victory of Vimy Ridge...


This may not the history of WWII that you are used to hearing - because it is not really true that only the victors write history : in reality it is often powerful victors with something to hide, with something to spin, that end up writing the big histories: Whig History.

 A special kind of Whig History, history re-written with an unique type of hindsight, so that it appears that all events on the victor's side of the war worked together to bring the war to the conclusion that actually happened.

D-Day then not just happened (hard to deny something as big as that anyway !) but was always planned to have happened, and happen when it did and as it did.

But while WWII was Modernity's very own war , at last, it turned out to be the Nadir of Modernity as well.

Because D-Day and the infantry-led conquest of Hitler's Germany, like the mass production of cheap natural penicillin , like the "non-precision" bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki , weren't supposed to happen.

 They were , all three , low tech "Plan B"s ,to cover-up the failure of three of the Allies' high tech "Plan A"s.......